Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Masters League T20
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- World Masters League T20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another mass-produced article on a non-notable OAP cricket league which fails WP:GNG and WP:OFFCRIC. Just because retired players are taking part, doesn't make this inherently notable. All sources are WP:ROUTINE. AA (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Cricket. AA (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Organizations. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete definitely fails OFFCRIC. I think it's a 50/50 call whether this actually fails the low bar of GNG or not, but I'd want to be 100% confident of meeting GNG to outweigh OFFCRIC. Not salted yet in case it does prove to ultimately have a legacy in its aftermath. Aspirex (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.